Although somewhat dated, this is a very good video and good introduction to the text below. Notice that in this video that the commentator states that even the head of the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2012 stated that 'capitalism is dead.'
Yes, capitalism is gasping for breath. We have been
experiencing the death of capitalism for at least thirty years. It has not been
apparent because it was masked by many factors. The world has changed and many
are holding on to a paradigm that emerged in 16th Century and
persisted till the late 20th Century. The evidences of a dying
system are: income inequality, environmental degradation (i.e, global warming,
depletion of the Amazon rain forest, over-fishing, genetic engineering and
decrease of agricultural species), a dependence on non-renewal resources for
economic growth sustenance, uneven regional economic development, domination of
multinational corporation over national interests, and faltering economic
growth (slow/stagnant in developing countries, erratic in developing
countries.)
In the ashes of a dying capitalism, a phoenix is rising to take its place. It is now nebulous, but slowly coalescing and has been for decades. With the economic crisis of 2008 and the continuing stagnation, it is evident that this is ‘the end of the line’ for capitalism. (It is not the end of the free market for the exchange of goods, services, ideas, technology and now, software. This is alive and well, but has been manipulated for the benefit of the One Percent under the guise of protecting capitalism.)The solutions that have been applied and are being proposed by nation-states, supranational organizations and think tanks are merely ‘band-aids’ to a system that needs not just overhaul, but creative destruction. The present form of capitalism will not slip quietly away, as those who have a stake in its present form will use any means to keep it alive so that can ‘pick off the remnants of the corpse.’
In the ashes of a dying capitalism, a phoenix is rising to take its place. It is now nebulous, but slowly coalescing and has been for decades. With the economic crisis of 2008 and the continuing stagnation, it is evident that this is ‘the end of the line’ for capitalism. (It is not the end of the free market for the exchange of goods, services, ideas, technology and now, software. This is alive and well, but has been manipulated for the benefit of the One Percent under the guise of protecting capitalism.)The solutions that have been applied and are being proposed by nation-states, supranational organizations and think tanks are merely ‘band-aids’ to a system that needs not just overhaul, but creative destruction. The present form of capitalism will not slip quietly away, as those who have a stake in its present form will use any means to keep it alive so that can ‘pick off the remnants of the corpse.’
The clues for the formation of this new paradigm are being
found in emerging movements such as the Occupy Movement, Progressive Movement
in the U.S., the international Pirate Party, the democracy movement in the
Middle East, Africa and South America, global environmental movement, and the
growing dissent in China. These coalitions
are presenting not just alternatives, but the building blocks for the next
paradigm, replacing those of Modernism/Post-Modernism, Industrial/Post-Industrial,
Fordism/Post-Ford- ism, and Realism/Noe-Conservatism/Liberalism. While many from
the traditional Left and Right would like to tag these movements within the
context of Marxism/Socialism/Anarchism, it is not following or adopting the overall
premises of these philosophies, to the dislike of both political spectrums who
would like to either bring them under their umbrella (the Left) or discredit
them (the Right.)
The emerging paradigm
is a hybrid of past political and economic philosophies being energized and
transformed by globalism and technology.
What do we call this new paradigm? The best so far has been to term the next
form of economics ‘natural capitalism’ as outlined by Paul Hawkins, Amory
Lovings and Hunter Lovings in their book, Natural Capitalism: Creating the
Next Industrial Revolution. (For further
information, go to the books website at: http://www.natcap.org/
.) However, this does not adequately encompass
the developing paradigm. There are hints
of the formulation of this paradigm in works by Robert Reich (Beyond Outrage,
After Shock, Supercapitalism—for more information go to : http://robertreich.org/), Richard Wolff (Democracy
at Work: A Cure for Capitalism, Occupying the Economy: Challenging Capitalism, Capitalism Hits the Fan:
The Global Economic Meltdown and What to Do About It and many others—for more
information go to : http://rdwolff.com/ Paul
Krugman (End this Depression Now!, The Conscience of a Liberal,
and more—for more information go to: http://www.pkarchive.org/
. Always controversial and interesting
is Noam Chomsky, his new book, Occupy, concerns his views on the
Movement and can be order via the
Zucottti Park Press at http://www.zuccottiparkpress.com/chomsky.html.
A new book, which I am just starting to
read is a collection of articles concerning the Occupy Movement, The Occupy
Handbook, offers diverse and interesting views from a wide variety of
authors. It is available from Amazon (http://www.amazon.com/The-Occupy-Handbook-Janet-Byrne/dp/0316220213
) or Barnes and Nobles (http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-occupy-handbook-janet-byrne/1107957786
.)
The above authors are not political pundits, such as Rush Limbaugh,
Glen Beck and others speaking for the Tea Party and the new conservatives
(notice the little ‘c’ as I don’t believe these guys are true Conservatives.) If
you take a more than casual glace, among them are experienced energy experts,
professors in Economics and Political Science, a renowned linguist and social critic, and a Noble Peace prize
winner. These people are not flakes,
wild-eyed kooks, but knowledgeable and sane individuals who have studied
problems and present the framework for a new future.
The Tea Party which is dominating
the Republican Party are merely stooges for the One Percent. They betray the
Conservatism that W.F. Buckley, Jr. single-handily created which was
intellectual, fair, respectful of the opposition, and well-grounded in Conservative
economic and political theory. I think he
would be appalled at the viciousness of the rhetoric of the Tea Party, the brazenness
of the supporters of the Republican Party to pour money into campaigns to
malign candidates, the uncompromising positions being held toward moral issues,
their anti-intellectual nature and the overt and ‘not so’ covert adoption of the
principles of Ayn Rand. In addition, the Tea Party has drawn to it those who
believe in conspiracy theory, survivalists and perhaps Neo-Nazis. It is a motley
bunch that true Conservatives are probably hesitant to be associated.
The body of work that are being created by the aforementioned
intellectuals are preparing the foundation of a new future. It is one of hope,
prosperity, equality, justice, direct democracy, peace, protection of the environment,
responsible energy use, and ultimately the creation of a sustainable world. The
Republicans and their brand of conservatism represent a thinly veiled attempt
to maintain the status quo mainly to keep the One Percent on top, controlling the
world for their selfish ends and maintaining a capitalism that is corrupted and
unsustainable. This is a Hobbesian world
through the philosophical eyes of Ayn Rand. Their agenda will surely fail because
it translates into tyranny and many in the U.S. and the world now know exactly what
is their aim.
Capitalism is dead and the future is here!
No comments:
Post a Comment